The AI takes keep getting worse and worse.

"If you are a creative, you need to adapt or just like give up and become an Uber driver until everyone has a Waymo, I know it's not cool or classy to speak like this, but I'm not gonna candy coat the future. It is what it is. Sorry for bad news," with an apostrophe, "my purist?"

Diplo, shut the hell up.

Not only is this offensive to other creatives, but people who just work normal everyday jobs like driving an Uber. But what is this AI supremacy BS?

For a lot of artists out there from many different mediums, the creative process is part of what makes doing art fun and, you know, what makes it attractive as a career. Having AI do it for you is the complete removal of that journey.

So of course, there are some people just based on that principle alone are not going to be interested, and those people should give up their work and give up their passion and stop doing what they're doing because they're not going to use AI. They should just go drive an Uber instead?

And of course, part of the reason he's motivated to say this is that he's invested in AI. You go drive an Uber if you hate it so much, and give your studio and your equipment and all of your money to an Uber driver who actually would like to be a musician and spend their time making music with their hands and their brain.